Českáposádka ve vrtulníku AH-1Z Viper Má samotěsnící nádrže, které jsou schopny po průstřelu vzápětí utěsnit celý objem nádrže a zamezit unikání paliva. Trup a sedadla byly naprojektovány tak, aby byly co nejvíce odolné proti prudkým nárazům a v případě nouzového přistání či nehody se zvýšila šance
ByDario Leone. Oct 25 2022. ‘The AH-1Z Viper is faster and more maneuverable than the heavier AH-64D/E Apache. The drawback to this, however, is firepower,’ Caleb Posey, Apache Helicopter Repairman at
ByVaibhav Agrawal. 2022-04-26. To fulfil Poland’s attack helicopter requirement, on 21 April, the government said that it would be choosing between Bell AH-1Z Viper and AH
BellAH-1Z Viper. The American Viper is a third-generation descendant of the venerable Bell AH-1 Cobra, the predecessor of all modern attack helicopters. The AH-64E Apache Guardian is the latest Meanwhile the AH-1Z Viper's agility and firepower make it well-suited for close air support and armed reconnaissance. In conclusion, the choice between the AH
Subscribed 6K views 6 years ago. Bell AH-1Z Viper vs AH-64 Apache, Helicopter performance : The Bell AH-1Z Viper is a twin-engine attack helicopter based
Theonly way to fully lose control over the helicopter would be to lose complete pressure in both hydraulic circuits. Hence why the Immediate Action for Dual Hyd failure is Land Immediately (if you don't land on the thing below you, you will crash). As for AH-1Z vs DCS Apache.Capableof operating at high altitude and speed, the two-seater Ka-52 snags the top spot from the usual winner, the Apache. The Alligator's anti-ship missiles have better range than the Apache and the helicopter boasts similar armor and air-to-air capability. A one-seat version, the Ka-50, is also lethal. 2. AH-64 ApacheTheAH-1, along with it's counterpart, the UH-1, are both designed to operate from ships, while the AH-64 operates from land bases. Operating from sea requires FULv9.
